Many healthcare providers who are transitioning from paper charts to electronic health records (EHRs) need help understanding how to work with the paper charts they built over their many years in practice. Most physicians have already implemented EHR software at this point, but for those who are still using paper charts, implementing an EHR system may seem daunting and filled with headaches. However, implementation of EHR technology will only help every physician work more efficiently, stay connected to their practice from anywhere, and accomplishing exactly what they set out to do when they decided to go to medical school. There are three approaches:
EHR Implementation: What You Need to Know
Scan all your paper charts and upload the scanned charts to the EHR — This approach is the most expensive approach. Typically, if a practice wants to take this approach, they outsource the scanning to a third party and have every piece of paper scanned and uploaded into the EHR. The main advantage to this approach is that the paper chart becomes obsolete and can be stored offsite. The major disadvantage to this approach is the cost of scanning and uploading — usually a practice will pay between five and ten thousand dollars to the scanning company for the use and time it takes them to open each chart and high-speed scan every single SOAP note and test result.
Since the complete chart is available in digital format, the user never has to reference a paper chart, but the provider may have to wade through pages of scanned data to find the specific records that reflect the milestone events that best summarize the patient’s medical history.
Rating: Effective – Very costly
Scan nothing and carry the paper chart into the exam room — Physicians that promote this method still like the feel of the paper chart and frankly have trouble making the commitment to an EHR in the early stages of adoption. The advantage of this method is that no scanning is required. The disadvantage is obvious; the EHR never tells the complete story regarding the patient history, especially with regard to certain milestone events that impacted the patient’s health. The physician is committed to two systems all of the time for an indefinite period of time. The practice never gets the opportunity to save money by reducing chart pulls; the first visit is easier with this method — just pull the chart, the subsequent visits become more expensive with each additional chart pull. With Web-based EHR systems like MediTouch EHR®, providers can securely view patient records anywhere they choose, but they cannot have a copy of the paper chart with them at all times, so this method does not appeal to the mobile healthcare professional.
Rating: Least Effective – Least costly in the beginning, but expensive over time
Scan only what you need — This approach is based on the premise that you don’t need to scan every piece of paper in the chart, the assumption is that you don’t need to see everything that happened in the past. With this method your staff scans “just enough”, based on the provider’s decision to competently care for the patient, and no more. Most practices find that scanning less than 10% of the paper chart gives them the data they need to provide the excellent care that their patients expect. The typical method requires some minor preparation the day before the patient is seen. The provider marks what records require scanning or the practice creates a “formula” for every chart. Formulas work in some cases, but provider input always helps to streamline the process. Scanning and sorting documents “in the cloud” with MediTouch EHR® is simple because users can upload files in bulk (not one patient at a time), and then sort them into the appropriate chart once they are uploaded. There is clearly some work involved in preparing a patient file the day before a visit. We also recommend populating the allergy and medication lists the day before to help the practice meet the Meaningful Use requirements for those list types (scanned images of those lists don’t meet the government Meaningful Use measures). The problem list can be populated from the office visit SOAP note, so we do not recommend spending time on that one the day before. One of the great features of MediTouch EHR® is that the medication list can be imported from the Surescipts® database, so manual entry is minimized. Even with the process automation built into MediTouch®, offices should anticipate several minutes per patient, preparing the EHR for a visit — but only the first time a new patient is seen. This time investment reaps great rewards for the office because, when the patient returns for the next visit, there is no chart pull. In addition, all of the workflows related to adding lab results and incoming faxes to the chart are streamlined. The net result is that with regard to handling the chart, EHRs reduce work for the staff over time, but on the first visit an investment must be made.
Rating: Most Effective – Least costly over time
Medication History List Import Screen
Most experts agree that paper charts will play a role in most practices for a few years after the adoption of electronic medical records. Do not rush to become completely paperless at the start of implementation — very few practices need to or can afford to make that change in just a few weeks. Take your time on moving away from paper completely and try to populate the chart with just enough data, such that when you move from office to office, or office to home, that you can understand your patient’s health and render sound medical decisions based on the use of the EHR alone. With MediTouch® bulk scanning, incoming fax handling and the creation of problem lists and medication lists is easy — HealthFusion® makes the transition from paper simple and less time consuming. Remember moving to an EHR should not reduce your revenue — make sure that your staff takes a few minutes per patient to prepare in advance, so that your patient flow remains stable, or even grows!
Advantages and Disadvantages of EHR
When you are first thinking of moving from paper to an electronic medical record system, the disadvantages of EHR can seem to outweigh the upsides. Many are concerned with privacy issues, data loss, lower productivity during implementation, training and the ability to coordinate care.
But using a cloud-based system like MediTouch offers solutions to these challenges — as well as a plethora of other advantages. Identity theft is actually much more plausible in a paper scenario or a client-server scenario. With a web-based EHR, you’ll never have to worry about data loss, either. Your data is stored securely online. EHR software allows you to process patient information using the correct, most up-to-date ICD codes, consolidates your patient records and streamlines your workflow.